【CLIQ 5234 交流专区】CLIQ能源

icy97

證監會：考慮股東權益 堅持CLIQ能源需清盤退款

2016年4月12日
（吉隆坡12日訊）證券監督委員會（SC）表示，該會在處理所有企業建議時，都會考量股東權益，儘管CLIQ能源（CLIQ，5234，主要板特殊併購）今次入稟法庭提出司法審查（judicial review），證監會也堅持捍衛決定。

據《星報》報導，CLIQ能源通過Best Oracle私人有限公司史無前例向證監會採取法律行動，入稟法庭要求司法審查，挑戰證監會在1月7日針對該公司提議收購Phystech II公司51%股權提出提交更多資料的要求。

Best Oracle私人有限公司是CLIQ能源的合格保薦人（promoters）及持有后者20%股權。

CLIQ能源早在2013年4月以特殊併購公司上市馬股，建議以1億1730萬美元（約5億1850萬令吉）價碼收購特殊併購公司Phystech II公司的51%股權 ，后者在哈薩克斯坦（Kazakhstan）持有油田。

德勤在一份獨立評估報告中指出，在計入獨立技術專家兼資產評估專家AGR提供的修正現金流價值后，認為1億1730萬美元的收購價是公平及合理價碼。

但證監會在1月29日退回上述申請，並尋求顧問提供更多訊息，但CLIQ能源最終未能及時補交額外資料，上述收購申請因此被視為不完整，以致CLIQ能源無法在3年限期內完成合格收購活動（QA）資產的要求。

CLIQ能源因此被迫除牌下市，並將所有信托戶頭內的款項退回給股東，屆時CLIQ能源股東料可獲每股回退73仙。【中国报财经】

icy97

玉楼金阙：CLIQ起诉证监会有胜算吗？‧陈金阙

财经 评论 玉楼金阙  2016-04-13 11:55
在我们安心等待SONA石油下一个特大开会时，另一边厢CLIQ能源发生了一件新鲜事。

所谓“新鲜事”，是公司持股20%的大股东BEST ORACLE，决定起诉证监委员会（SC），要求高庭对证监会拒绝CLIQ能源延长公司收购合格资产的期限进行司法审核。

起诉人将证监会列为第一答辩人和CLIQ能源公司列为第二答辩人。

向来证监委员会代表了大马股市立法的权威，所有关系到立法和执法的事项，几乎都由它来执行。

当然，就算是当局或政府，也不是不能挑战的，只是通常在挑战当局时，要称一称自己有几分斤两，没有胜利的把握，何必去花那冤枉的律师费？

印象中曾经有投资者因东家（那时还叫依恩奥，E&O）的股权变动起诉证监会。

2011年，森那美以2.30令吉高价收购30%东家股权（东家那时市价只有1.45令吉），引起是否应该进行全面收购的争议，虽然证监会裁决森那美无需全购，不过，这项举动还是让很多投资者不甘心。

多一事不如少一事

这事件经过不久，就有东家的小股东起诉证监会。不过，几年后东家股价大涨，超过2.30令吉，起诉与否已失去意义，所以，最后小股东应该是见机行事，撤销诉讼，不了了之。

所以，许多投资者认为，起诉证监会就好像起诉警方一样，胜利的机会渺茫，此外，如果起诉者是代表上市公司，不满证监会的决定，一怒诉讼，失败是小事，还怕执法者秋后算账，让公司以后的日子难过，所以多一事不如少一事。

不过，这班CLIQ能源的大股东们已经没有明天了，不但没有明天，服从证监会的结果是背上投资失败的罪名，让一个SPAC的上市公司黯然下市，辜负了许多投资者的期望。

不甘当温驯小绵羊？

那么，为什么要隔了三个月才起诉？或许他们看到SONA石油那么戏剧性的发展，由不可能变可能，因此，为自己这么久以来做了一只温驯的小绵羊而感到十分不忿，于是决定再向虎山行，为自己呼冤。

无论如何，如本文开端所言，自古民不与官斗，起诉当局，胜望非常小；不过，如果是为了出一口气，或是为“道理”而战，又另当别论。

奇怪的是，大股东也代表了公司管理层董事部成员，这样自己起诉自己，诉方和辩方两顶帽子戴在同一个头上，在诉讼方面该如何据理力争？

这也勾起另一个遐思：在CLIQ能源退回资本的过程中，管理层、没有份拿回资本的大股东和先锋投资者，扮演了什么角色？能否在投票过程参与表决吗？

陈金阙 专业财务规划师

【南洋网财经】

icy97

MASTERSKILL前首腦‧西瓦古瑪成CLIQ大股東

2016-04-15 11:07      
（吉隆坡14日訊）多次傳出負面新聞的MASTERSKILL教育（MEGB）前大股東西瓦古瑪，崛起成為可能清盤的CLIQ能源（CLIQ,5234,主板特別併購）顯著大股東。

交易所資料顯示，西瓦古瑪3月31日透過場外交易，買下CLIQ能源的3千460萬零100股，持股達5.484%。

今日閉市，CLIQ能源下跌0.5仙，報68仙。

CLIQ能源無法在規定期限收購合格資產，遭證券監督委員會發出清盤退款令，CLIQ能源管理團隊入稟高等法院要求司法審核。

不過，在沒有面對清盤和解散的任何禁令下，該公司將繼續落實和處理清盤和解散程序，以將資金回退至股東信託基金。

西瓦古瑪多次傳出負面新聞，寧可捨棄以每股1令吉10仙脫售MASTERSKILL教育股權給香港投資者，卻同意以每股60仙把股權賣給SMRT控股（SMRT,0117,創業板科技組），引起市場疑慮。

隨後，西瓦古瑪意圖低價收購MASTERSKILL教育資產，最後這項打算以7千500萬令吉收購4項產業和地庫的提案無疾而終，草草結束。（星洲日報／財經）

Notice of Interest Sub. S-hldr (29A)

CLIQ ENERGY BERHAD

Particulars of Substantial Securities Holder

Name	MR SIVA KUMAR A/L M.JEYAPALAN
Nationality/Country of incorporation	Malaysia
Descriptions (Class & nominal value)	Ordinary shares of RM0.01 each
Name & address of registered holder	Siva Kumar a/l M.JeyapalanNo. 2, Jalan Desa BahagiaTaman Desa58100 Kuala Lumpur

Date interest acquired & no of securities acquired
Currency	Malaysian Ringgit (MYR)
Date interest acquired	31 Mar 2016
No of securities	34,600,100
Circumstances by reason of which Securities Holder has interest	Acquisition of shares
Nature of interest	Direct interest
Price Transacted ($$)
Total no of securities after change
Direct (units)	34,600,100
Direct (%)	5.484
Indirect/deemed interest (units)	0
Indirect/deemed interest (%)	0
Date of notice	14 Apr 2016

icy97

Type	Announcement
Subject	OTHERS
Description	Update to Shareholders
The Board of Directors of CLIQ Energy Berhad (“Board”) (“CLIQ/the Company”) (represented by the directors who are not conflicted to decide on behalf of the Company) wishes to update the shareholders that the Board is fully aware of the expectation of the entitled shareholders to receive monies from the trust account arising from the inability of the Company to secure the qualifying acquisition asset. The Board wishes to update that the Company has been actively engaging with the regulators since middle of February 2016 to discuss, amongst others, the various processes and procedures in relation to this unprecedented liquidation of a special purpose acquisition company. The Company has considered the three methods of liquidation, i.e. members voluntary liquidation, creditors voluntary liquidation and winding up by court order, and at present, the documentation for all 3 winding up methods are being considered and/or prepared. The Company is aware that it has been named as one of the respondents in the judicial review application (“Judicial Review”) filed by Best Oracle Sdn Bhd and takes the view that it is not cost effective for the Company to intervene in the Judicial Review. Best Oracle Sdn Bhd is the 20% shareholder of the Company and the shareholders of Best Oracle Sdn Bhd are the 5 members of the Management Team of CLIQ. As far as the Company is concerned, as announced on 10 April 2016, given that the High Court has not granted an injunction order against the Company from proceeding with the liquidation and dissolution process, in accordance with the laws and requirements, the Company is working very hard towards being able to officially appoint the liquidators via one of the three liquidation methods, and thereafter commence the liquidation process. Another announcement will be made on the progress of the liquidation process once the liquidation documents are filed. This announcement is dated 15 April 2016.

icy97

安德鲁亚历山辞职 CLIQ 能源仅剩4董事

财经新闻 财经  2016-04-22 10:42
（吉隆坡21日讯）CLIQ能源（CLIQ，5234，主板特殊收购股）澳洲籍独立董事安德鲁亚历山大宣布辞职，如今董事部仅剩4名成员，比上市条例要求的至少5名要少。
今年61岁的安德鲁是在16日（周六），以追求其他事业与责任为由递上辞呈。

不过，随着CLIQ能源收购资产的三年期限已在9日结束，因此，相信该公司也不会被迫委任另一名董事，取代安德鲁。

安德鲁并不是第一位辞职的董事，早前，该公司无法交上充足的资产收购建议给证监会，随后就有两名独立董事宣布辞职。

如今，留在董事部的两名独立董事，包括拿督阿兹米和朱利安，前者也是公司的主席。另外两名则是董事经理兼总执行长阿末吉雅依里阿斯，以及执行董事卡马鲁巴哈林。

阿末吉雅依里阿斯和卡马鲁巴哈林，也是大股东Best Oracle私人有限公司的代表。

本月10日，持有CLIQ能源20%股权的Best Oracle，向高等法院申请司法审核，寻求高庭裁决证券监督委员会准许公司延长收购合格资产（QA）的期限，避免公司遭解散。
12日，证监会表示，将针对司法审核展开抗辩。【南洋网财经】

icy97

大限前没重交收购申请 传CLIQ能源要诉马银行投行

财经新闻 财经  2016-04-24 12:04
（吉隆坡23日讯）传CLIQ能源（CLIQ，5234，主板特殊收购股）正考虑对马银行投行展开法律诉讼，因为该行当时作为主要顾问，没有在收购合格资产（QA）的最后期限，提交重新调整的申请。

《The Edge》引述消息人士透露：“CLIQ能源表示，马银行投行没有在最后期限为公司提交重新调整收购建议的申请。”

消息指，若CLIQ能源决定向马银行投行采取法律诉讼，也不是通过公司名义进行，而是由管理层采取行动。

CLIQ能源管理层已向大马高庭申请，对证监会展开司法审查，这被视为是公司延长申请收购期限，及逃离被解散的最后一步。

即将解散

根据该项司法审查申请，公司表示，马银行投行没有提交重新调整的收购申请。

该文件提到，CLIQ能源已要求马银行投行在1月22日的截止日，重新提交有关申请给证监会。

此外，该文件也提到证监会并无反对公司独立估价师德勤（Deloitte）使用Tracs-Consult LLC使用的技术报告，直至截止日期前两周才表示，达不到其要求，并要求德勤进行独立评估。

早前，CLIQ能源因为收购资产的建议因资料与文件不足，而被证监会退回，之后向证监会申请延长收购期限的申请。

由于公司申请延迟收购油田资产被拒，因此，即将进入解散及退款给股东的程序。【南洋网财经】

icy97

司法审核与清盘令聆审撞期 CLIQ能源吁股东谨慎交易

财经新闻 财经  2016-05-03 10:05
（吉隆坡2日讯）由于大股东向高庭申请司法审核和清盘令的聆审日期“撞期”，恐会耽误退换资金，因此，CLIQ能源（CLIQ，5234，主板特殊收购股）劝请股东谨慎交易股票。

该公司在文告中澄清，公司未和证监会就清盘令展开诉讼，反之是以董事经理兼总执行长、财务总监兼执行董事人以及另外前3名前管理层，通过Best Oracle私人有限公司，向高庭申请司法审核，以对证监会拒绝公司延长收购合格资产（QA）期限等决定和要求，展开司法审核。

Best Oracle向高庭寻求取消或撤回证监会早前的决定或要求、暂停公司目前正进行的解散和清盘程序，以及裁决证监会准许公司延长收购合格资产（QA）的期限，避免公司遭解散。

Best Oracle为CLIQ能源大股东，持有20%的股权。

如今，高庭定于5月11日为Best Oracle司法审查申请过堂，5月31日聆审。

另外，CLIQ能源指出，公司遵守1965年公司法令要求，以及公司章程和证监会股票指南，在未能指定期限购得QA将进行清盘程序，而高庭已定于5月31日进行聆审。

该公司委任国富浩华（Crowe Horwath）顾问私人有限公司的翁建和和莫源乐（人名皆译音）为清盘师，资本回退时间将在取得庭令后，做出适时的公布。

该公司指出，基于不可预见的干预或是引起任何一方的争议，恐未能取得清盘令，因此退款给股东的程序或会耽误。

因此，CLIQ能源呼吁股东在5月31日听审前，谨慎交易公司股票。

上周五闭市时，CLIQ能源收报67.5仙，交易平盘，成交量达237万股。

CLIQ能源是在2013年4月10日，以特殊收购公司（SPAC）的形式在大马交易所上市。

不过，在今年2月24日，由于CLIQ能源申请延迟收购油田资产被拒，因此，即将进入解散及退款给股东的程序，成为大马股市的首例。【南洋网财经】

Type	Announcement
Subject	WINDING UP / RECEIVER & MANAGER / RESTRAINING ORDER / SPECIAL ADMINISTRATOR
Description	Clarification & Update on Litigation
We refer to our announcement dated 10 April 2016. We have been notified by Best Oracle Sdn. Bhd. that the Kuala Lumpur High Court (“High Court”) has fixed 6 May 2016 for the hearing of the leave application by Best Oracle Sdn. Bhd. (“Best Oracle”). Best Oracle is a 20% shareholder of the CLIQ Energy Berhad (“CLIQ/the Company”) and the 5 shareholders of Best Oracle are the Chief Executive Officer/Managing Director and the Chief Financial Officer/Executive Director of CLIQ whilst the other three (3) were the former Management Team of CLIQ. We refer to the news article titled “Legal tussle between CLIQ and SC to start soon” which was featured in The Edge Financial Daily on 29 April 2016. We wish to clarify that there is no tussle between CLIQ and the Securities Commission (“SC”), as CLIQ did not initiate any legal action against the SC or vice versa. As announced on 10 April 2016, Best Oracle has filed a Judicial Review Application to the High Court in respect of the request/decision by the SC via a letter from Maybank Investment Bank Berhad on 7 January 2016 to CLIQ and CLIQ was named as a second respondent. This announcement is dated 29 April 2016.

Type	Announcement
Subject	WINDING UP / RECEIVER & MANAGER / RESTRAINING ORDER / SPECIAL ADMINISTRATOR
Description	Update of Liquidation
We refer to the announcement dated 25 April 2016 in relation to the filing of a petition (“Petition”) to the High Court of Malaya at Kuala Lumpur (“High Court”) to wind up CLIQ Energy Berhad (“CLIQ” or “Company”) under Section 218(1)(h) of the Companies Act, 1965 (“Act”). The Board of Directors of CLIQ (represented by the directors who are not conflicted to decide on behalf of the Company) (“Board”) wishes to update that: The rationale for the Company to proceed with winding up by court pursuant to Section 218(1)(h) of the Companies Act 1965 (“the Act”) is mainly due to the fact that that Section 218(1)(h) provides that where there is a fixed duration provided in a company’s Articles of Association and such duration expires, the court may order for the company to be wound up. As stated in the Company’s Prospectus dated 22 March 2013, the Company’s Articles of Association dated 2 February 2012 (“Company’s Articles”) and the Securities Commission Equity Guidelines, CLIQ's life is finite, if it is unable to acquire a qualifying asset. On this basis and pursuant to our discussion with CLIQ’s advisors, the Board is of the view that the Company should proceed with the winding up by court; Pursuant to Section 219(2) of the Act, “the winding up shall be deemed to have commenced at the time of the presentation of the petition for the winding up”. This means that the winding up proceedings of the Company has commenced on 25 April 2016, which is the date the Petition was filed in court; The High Court of Malaya at Kuala Lumpur has fixed 11 May 2016 for case management and 31 May 2016 for hearing of the Petition; Barring any unforeseen circumstances and subject to the Company having complied with all applicable rules, namely, the Act and Companies (Winding Up) Rules 1972, the Company expects to obtain an order of Court for the winding up of the Company and appointment of liquidator (“Court Order”) on 31 May 2016, being the date of the hearing. However, in the event there is any unforeseen intervention and/or if the Petition is contested by any party, the Court Order may not be obtained on this date and the proceedings may be delayed; Upon obtaining the Court Order among others: (i) Mr Onn Kien Hoe and/or Mr Mok Yuen Lok from Crowe Horwath Advisory Sdn. Bhd. will be appointed as the liquidators for the Company (“the Proposed Liquidators”); and (ii) The Liquidators will be permitted to make payment to and/or to take such necessary steps to meet the requirements as are provided for under Article 61C(7) of the Company’s Articles and to make a substantial interim payment to entitled shareholders. The detailed timeline on the proposed distribution of monies in the trust account to the entitled shareholders will be announced upon obtaining the Court Order. Shareholders are advised to trade in CLIQ shares with caution in view of the upcoming hearing of the Petition on 31 May 2016. This announcement is dated 29 April 2016.

icy97

高庭驳回CLIQ管理层司法审核申请
By Chen Shaua Fui / theedgemarkets.com   | May 6, 2016 : 5:04 PM MYT

（吉隆坡6日讯）以董事经理兼总执行长 Ahmad Ziyad Elias为首的CLIQ能源（CLIQ Energy Bhd）管理层，为阻止公司被清盘而提出的司法审核申请，今日遭高庭驳回。

CLIQ管理层通过 Best Oracle私人有限公司于上个月提出司法审核申请。Best Oracle持有CLIQ的20%股权。

CLIQ延长合格收购期限的申请在2月遭证券监督委员会拒绝，因而提出司法审核。

高庭今日指出，驳回司法审核申请是因为CLIQ管理层并没有用尽资本市场和证券法令第364条文下的选项，以取得证监会修改决定。

高庭法官 Datuk Hanipah Farikullah审理此案。Kamural Hisham代表CLIQ管理层，而 Lambart Rasaratnam代表证监会。

证监会和CLIQ分别是这项司法审核的第一和第二答辩人。

CLIQ管理层包括Ahmad Ziyad、执行董事 Kamarul Baharin Albakri、勘探副总裁 Dr Chang Kok Lip、开发与生产副总裁 Kamaroll Zaman Abdul Aziz，以及业务发展副总裁 Tengku Daud Shaifuddin Tengku Zainudin。

Ahmad Ziyad和Kamarul Baharin也是CLIQ董事部成员。

司法审核遭拒，CLIQ管理层将无法寻求禁令，阻止公司被清算。

代表出庭的Kamarul Baharin告诉theedgemarkets.com表示，与律师会面后，他们在讨论考虑选项。

（编译：陈慧珊）

Type	Announcement
Subject	MATERIAL LITIGATION
Description	UPDATE ON LEAVE APPLICATION BY BEST ORACLE SDN BHD FOR A JUDICIAL REVIEW OF THE DECISION MADE BY THE SECURITIES COMMISSION
Further to our announcement dated 29 April 2016, the Company represented by Non Executive Directors who are not conflicted to represent the Company, and upon due enquiries made, wishes to inform that at the hearing by the High Court today, in Kuala Lumpur, the leave application filed by Best Oracle Sdn. Bhd.(Best Oracle) for a judicial review of the decision made by the SC via a letter from Maybank Investment Bank Berhad dated 7th January 2016 and for which the Company was named as the second respondent, has been declined and or rejected by the High Court, with no order as to cost. The Company is not aware if Best Oracle intends to appeal against the said decision, and the Company will make further announcement if there is any further development on this case. This announcement is dated 6 May 2016.

icy97

Type	Announcement
Subject	WINDING UP / RECEIVER & MANAGER / RESTRAINING ORDER / SPECIAL ADMINISTRATOR
Description	Update of Liquidation
Further to our announcements dated 25 April 2016 and 29 April 2016 in relation to the filing of a petition (“Petition”) to the High Court of Malaya at Kuala Lumpur (“High Court”) to wind up CLIQ Energy Berhad (“CLIQ” or “Company”) under Section 218(1)(h) of the Companies Act, 1965 (“Act”), the Board of Directors of CLIQ (represented by the directors who are not conflicted to decide on behalf of the Company) (“Board”) wishes to update that the High Court of Kuala Lumpur, on 11 May 2016, has given direction for the Petition to be gazetted and advertised in national circulating newspapers. The High Court has fixed for the next case management on 27 May 2016 to obtain the Registrar’s certificate of procedural compliance, for the hearing on 31 May 2016. From now until the hearing date, the public and shareholders are to trade and deal with CLIQ's shares with caution. The Company had also on 11 May 2016 received, through its lawyers, a Notice of Intention to Appear (“Notice”) dated 9 May 2016 filed by Messrs. Yashar & Associates representing Best Oracle Sdn. Bhd. The Notice is filed for Best Oracle Sdn. Bhd. to appear at /attend the High Court hearing on 31 May 2016 with the intention to resist the Petition to wind up CLIQ. This announcement is dated 12 May 2016.

哭哭鸟

                              

Type	Announcement
Subject	WINDING UP / RECEIVER & MANAGER / RESTRAINING ORDER / SPECIAL ADMINISTRATOR
Description	Update of Liquidation
Further to our announcements dated 25 April 2016, 29 April 2016, 12 May 2016, 17 May 2016 and 20 May 2016 in relation to the filing of a petition (“Petition”) to the High Court of Malaya at Kuala Lumpur (“High Court”) to wind up CLIQ Energy Berhad (“CLIQ” or “Company”) under Section 218(1)(h) of the Companies Act, 1965 (“Act”), the Board of Directors of CLIQ (represented by the directors who are not conflicted to decide on behalf of the Company) (“Board”) wishes to inform that the Company was on 24 May 2016 served with an unsealed copy of the notice of application for Stay of Proceedings (“Stay Application”) from Messrs. Yashar & Associates (representing Best Oracle Sdn. Bhd.) to seek for (i) a stay of proceedings of the Petition pending hearing and disposal of Best Oracle Sdn. Bhd.’s shareholders’ appeal to the Court of Appeal against the decision of the High Court in the application for Judicial Review (“Appeal”); (ii) if the Appeal is granted by the Court of Appeal, all proceedings in the Petition to be stayed/ delayed pending the hearing and disposal of the Judicial Review Application in Kuala Lumpur High Court and (iii) costs of the Stay Application to be paid by the Company. The hearing date for the Stay Application has not yet been fixed as at the date of this announcement. This announcement is dated 25 May 2016.

                        
                        

icy97

CLIQ能源末季虧損收窄

2016-06-02 09:11      
（吉隆坡1日訊）營運開銷及金融成本促使CLIQ能源（CLIQ，5234，主板特別併購）仍處於虧損狀態，截至2016年3月31日第四季為止，虧損收窄至511萬4千令吉，全年虧損則擴大至1千395萬4千令吉。

基於該公司仍未成功收購資產，目前仍是零營收。

該公司透過文告表示，法庭將會在6月8日（週三）聆審股東阻止清盤事宜。（星洲日報／財經）

SUMMARY OF KEY FINANCIAL INFORMATION 31 Mar 2016

		INDIVIDUAL PERIOD		CUMULATIVE PERIOD
		CURRENT YEAR QUARTER	PRECEDING YEAR CORRESPONDING QUARTER	CURRENT YEAR TO DATE	PRECEDING YEAR CORRESPONDING PERIOD
		31 Mar 2016	31 Mar 2015	31 Mar 2016	31 Mar 2015
		$$'000	$$'000	$$'000	$$'000

1	Revenue	0	0	0	0
2	Profit/(loss) before tax	-4,012	-6,183	-12,230	-12,247
3	Profit/(loss) for the period	-5,114	-6,787	-13,954	-13,418
4	Profit/(loss) attributable to ordinary equity holders of the parent	-5,114	-6,787	-13,954	-13,418
5	Basic earnings/(loss) per share (Subunit)	0.01	0.01	0.02	0.02
6	Proposed/Declared dividend per share (Subunit)	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
		AS AT END OF CURRENT QUARTER		AS AT PRECEDING FINANCIAL YEAR END
7	Net assets per share attributable to ordinary equity holders of the parent ($$)	0.0000		0.0200

icy97

CLIQ能源大股东制止公司清盘申请的决定将于本周五出炉
By Chen Shaua Fui  / theedgemarkets.com   | June 8, 2016 : 7:57 PM MYT

（吉隆坡8日讯）CLIQ能源（CLIQ Energy Bhd）大股东Best Oracle私人有限公司向高等法院提出司法审核申请，以延长CLIQ能源合格收购（QA）的期限，并制止该公司进行清盘程序，司法审核的j结果将于本周五出炉。

司法专员Noorin Badaruddin今日在高庭聆听CLIQ能源及Best Oracle的辩词后，已定下司法审核结果出炉的日期。

持有CLIQ能源20%股权的Best Oracle，正寻求制止CLIQ能源向高庭提出的清盘申请，以阻止后者展开清盘程序。

Best Oracle法律顾问Shamsul Bahrin Manaf今日在高庭辩称，指CLIQ能源向高庭提呈清盘申请前，应该就清盘一事让股东投票决定。

不过，CLIQ能源法律顾问Wong Kah Hui则争辩指，并没必要让股东投票决定，因为这是非自愿清盘。

CLIQ能源在1965年公司法令下的218条文(1)(h)下，于4月25日向法院提出清盘申请。

Best Oracle 5月因未能获得高庭批准其司法审核的申请，以制止CLIQ能源清盘的程序。Best Oracle随即提呈上诉，今早接获上诉庭发出的信函，将在明日就此事进行个案管理。

CLIQ能源管理团队包括总执行长Ahmad Ziyad Elias、执行董事Kamarul Baharin Albakri、勘探部副总裁Dr Chang Kok Lip、开发和生产部副总裁Kamaroll Zaman Abdul Aziz，以及业务发展部副总裁Tengku Daud Shaifuddin Tengku Zainudin。

CLIQ能源因大马证券监督委员会（SC）早前拒绝其收购拥有Phystech Firm LLP在哈萨克斯坦两个陆地油田的特殊用途公司（SPV）51%股权的合格收购延长期限申请，因而提出司法审核申请。

根据法规，公司必须将首次公开募股（IPO）所筹集的90%资金，合共3亿5572万令吉归还股东的信托账户。

（编译：倪嫣鴽）

icy97

CLIQ能源清盘判决展延

2016年6月11日
（吉隆坡10日讯）大马高庭展延至6月24日，公布CLIQ能源（CLIQ，5234，主板特殊收购股）清盘申请的判决。

CLIQ能源大的大股东Best Oracle私人有限公司法律顾问三苏巴林，向《The Edge》表示，高庭已定在6月24日，下午3时公布判决。

“在公布申请判决后，她（司法委员诺琳巴达拉丁）将会决定进行案件管理的日期，进行申请程序。”

周三，诺琳已在公开法庭表示，她会提交判决。

CLIQ能源在4月25日向大马高庭提出清盘申请，以解散公司。

此外，该公司也向高庭申请司法审核，要求法庭暂停清盘令，但却在5月9日遭到法庭的拒绝。

包含了CLIQ能源管理层的Best Oracle，目前在上诉法庭，针对该项决定作出上诉。

CLIQ能源管理层，包括董事经理兼总执行长阿末吉雅依里阿斯、执行董事卡马鲁巴哈林、勘探副总裁张国立（译音）、发展与生产副总裁贾玛罗札曼，以及业务发展副总裁东姑达勿赛夫丁。

自CLIQ能源无法获得大马证券监督委员的批准，延期完成收购合格资产（QA）后，就展开清盘及法律程序。【e南洋】

Type	Announcement
Subject	WINDING UP / RECEIVER & MANAGER / RESTRAINING ORDER / SPECIAL ADMINISTRATOR
Description	Update of Liquidation
Further to our announcements dated 25 April 2016, 29 April 2016, 12 May 2016, 17 May 2016, 20 May 2016, 25 May 2016, 26 May 2016, 27 May 2016 and 8 June 2016, the Board of Directors of CLIQ (represented by the directors who are not conflicted to decide on behalf of the Company) (“Board”) wishes to inform that the High Court of Malaya at Kuala Lumpur (“High Court”) had fixed the decision date for the application to strike out the petition to wind-up CLIQ (“Petition”) filed by Best Oracle Sdn Bhd (“Striking Out Application”) on 24 June 2016. The hearing of the application for stay of proceedings of the Petition (“Stay Application") and the Petition will be fixed once the striking out has been disposed off, and if the same is in the favour of the Company. This announcement is dated 10 June 2016.

雷克斯R

要清盤就快點. 拖延有甚麼目的? 很讓人懷疑

icy97

Best Oracle挑战CLIQ能源清盘申请宣告失败
By Chen Shaua Fui  / theedgemarkets.com   | June 24, 2016 : 7:44 PM MYT

（吉隆坡24日讯）持有CLIQ能源（CLIQ Energy Bhd）20%股权的Best Oracle私人有限公司欲制止这家特殊用途收购公司（SPAC）清盘却宣告失败，高等法庭已驳回其制止CLIQ能源执行清盘程序的申请。

司法专员Noorin Badaruddin表示：“法庭认为呈请人（CLIQ能源）不应被阻止进行清盘程序，因此，高庭将能够参考所有的证据，并确定是否该颁布一项指令或是作出其他决定。”

她披露，根据大马交易所的条规与制度，CLIQ能源成立的主旨为在36个月内完成合格收购资产（QA），惟该集团最终未能在期限（4月9日）前完成合格收购资产。

“这是一个有效、公正和公平的呈请人清盘申请。”

在参考过CLIQ能源的协会章程和备忘录后，再根据公司法令及大马证券监督委员会（SC）的指南，Noorin认为，CLIQ能源没必要在提呈清盘申请前先征得股东的批准。

她也指出，CLIQ能源已不再全面营运，员工也已被裁退，而该集团也没有资金来支付必要的成本。

因此，Noorin表示，该集团也不能再运行日常事务。

她也指出，其他股东或利益相关者应给予机会，并出席清盘呈请的聆讯。

Best Oracle的法律顾问Shamsul Bahrin Manaf表示，该公司将在下周就高庭的决定提出上诉。

Best Oracle今年1月入禀法院，要求司法审核，阻止CLIQ能源面临清盘的危机。

该公司是因大马证券监督委员会（SC）早前拒绝其延长收购合格资产（QA）计划期限的申请， 因而提出这项司法审核申请。

该公司也已就司法审核申请的决定提出上诉。

（编译：倪嫣鴽）

Type	Announcement
Subject	WINDING UP / RECEIVER & MANAGER / RESTRAINING ORDER / SPECIAL ADMINISTRATOR
Description	Update of Liquidation
Further to our announcements dated 25 April 2016, 29 April 2016, 12 May 2016, 17 May 2016, 20 May 2016, 25 May 2016, 26 May 2016, 27 May 2016, 8 June 2016, 10 June 2016 and 15 June 2016, the Board of Directors of CLIQ (represented by the directors who are not conflicted to decide on behalf of the Company) (“Board”) wishes to inform that the application to strike out the petition to wind-up CLIQ (“Petition”) filed by Best Oracle Sdn Bhd (“Striking Out Application”) had been dismissed by the High Court of Malaya at Kuala Lumpur (“Court”) with costs of RM3,000.00 to be paid to CLIQ. The Court has fixed the hearing of the application for stay of proceeding of the Petition (“Stay Application”) and the case management date for the Petition on 29 June 2016. This announcement is dated 24 June 2016.

icy97

CLIQ阻止清盘申请遭驳回

（吉隆坡19日讯）CLIQ能源（CLIQ，5234，主板特别并购）大股东Best Oracle力阻公司清盘的努力再以失败收场，高等法庭今日正式驳回其阻止清盘活动的申请。

这是持有CLIQ能源约20%股权的Best Oracle，在力阻公司清盘过程中的第三次败北。Best Oracle是由CLIQ能源董事部成员控制的公司。

资料显示，Best Oracle之前是因证券监督委员会拒绝延长其收购资产的限期，而提出司法审查申请，将证券监督委员会和CLIQ能源列为辩方，但未获放行，此案目前仍在上诉中。

根据上市条例，CLIQ能源须把首次公开售股（IPO）所筹获资金的90%归还给股东。

文章来源：
星洲日报‧财经‧2016.07.20

Type	Announcement
Subject	WINDING UP / RECEIVER & MANAGER / RESTRAINING ORDER / SPECIAL ADMINISTRATOR
Description	Update of Liquidation
Further to our announcements dated 25 April 2016, 29 April 2016, 12 May 2016, 17 May 2016, 20 May 2016, 25 May 2016, 26 May 2016, 27 May 2016, 8 June 2016, 10 June 2016, 15 June 2016, 24 June 2016 and 29 June 2016, the Board of Directors of CLIQ (represented by the directors who are not conflicted to decide on behalf of the Company) (“Board”) wishes to inform that during the hearing today, Best Oracle Sdn Bhd (“Best Oracle”) had decided to withdraw its Stay Application for Judicial Review and consequently, costs of RM3,000.00 was awarded to CLIQ. Further, as to Best Oracle’s Stay Application for Striking out Appeal (consequent of the High Court of Kuala Lumpur’s dismissal of the striking out application filed by Best Oracle) after having heard submissions from counsels, the Learned Judge dismissed the Stay Application for Striking Out Appeal with costs of RM4,000.00 to be paid by Best Oracle to CLIQ. The Petition to wind up CLIQ under Section 218(1)(h) of the Companies Act, 1965 is fixed for hearing on 20 September 2016. This announcement is dated 19 July 2016.

icy97

未经董事部批准多出一页文告
CLIQ年报引发混淆

2016年8月2日

报道：姚思敏

（吉隆坡2日讯）即将解散的特殊收购公司（SPAC）CLIQ能源（CLIQ，5234，主板特殊收购股），近日发布的实体《2016年报》中，离奇出现一页“延长收购时间的好处”文告，而该文告是未经董事部批准的。据悉，这页“文告”的出现，已经导致股东混淆。

针对此事，CLIQ能源独立董事今天发文告澄清时指出，在已发行的实体年报中有一页关于“公司管理层和发起人（Promoters）的文告”，是在董事部不知情和未经准许下发行的。

这页“偷跑”的文告披露，管理层已就延长收购合格资产（QA）的时间，发出上诉信函给大马证券监督委员，这符合公司设立和在马交所主板上市的理由。

董事部晚间再发文告指出，该“文告”所指的上诉并非新的上诉，基于证监会已在2月份拒绝延长收购资产期限的申请，因此，目前并没有任何上诉申请等待证监会的批准。

此外，董事部也说，公司目前正在处理清盘程序，以便把款项回退给股东。

“离奇文告”所列出的7项获得延长收购时间的好处

1.将让CLIQ能源所有投资者和股东，如发起人、初期投资者、凭单持有人和股东受惠，且将提供给股东一个公平的机会，评估和作出明智及独立决定，以决定未来在公司的投资。

2.这亦会重新灌输和推广资本市场的信心，特别是SPAC。因此，公司的初期投资者和投资者，普遍能够作出一项期待从资产收购获得潜在回酬的投资，多过期待从公司解散后取得收益的投资。

投资在凭单并转换成股票，将为公司注入新的资本，长期将提高价值。

3.证监会最终的责任，是作为一名监管者，并保护股东或投资者。因此，当SPAC达到监管者施加的要求，证监会应该发行必要的批核，之后股东能够作出最终的投资决定。

4.在完成收购合格资产后，将会证明大马有经营外国公司的专才和能力。

5.也会在油气领域中制造就业机会。

6.批准延长收购时间，将让CLIQ能源成功收购合格资产，而这将为长期投资者带来潜在投资机会，如官联公司，包括国库控股（Khazanah）、国民投资机构（PNB）、雇员公积金局（EPF）等。

7.市场对油气领域有很强大的信念，预计油价进一步大跌的几率不高。同时，他们认为低油价将带来正面效应，让公司能以较低价格收购资产，并在油价复苏时创造价值。


陈金阙：或人为疏忽股东无需大惊小怪

针对CLIQ能源《2016年报》的“离奇”文告，本报专栏作家陈金阙认为，股东不需大惊小怪，因为相信是人为疏忽。

陈金阙接受《南洋商报》电访时说，相信这是人为疏忽，而非股东和管理层之间出现意见分歧。

“目前，CLIQ能源正在进行解散程序，所以，相信这页公司管理层和发起人的文告，只是一项人为疏忽。我相信，是员工看漏眼，放到很旧以前的文告。”

他指，据说公司的总执行长已经没有上班了，而且之前已解雇员工，目前剩下的员工，只是在进行解散工作而已。

去年初，CLIQ能源献议以1亿1730万美元（4亿3340万令吉），收购在中东哈萨克斯坦（Kazakhstan）经营两块油田的特殊用途公司。

然而，由于CLIQ能源收购资产的建议所提呈的资料与文件不足，进而被证监会退回，导致公司无法在条例规定下的期限内购得合格资产。

今年2月，CLIQ能源申请延迟收购油田资产，不过也证监会拒绝。

虽然市场在3月间，传出CLIQ能源的董事已呈上新的上诉信函，以完成合格资产收购，但CLIQ能源董事部澄清，公司并没有提呈新的上诉申请，也预计不会再对证监会提出上诉。

不过，不愿意公司就此遭到清盘的大股东Best Oracle，转向高庭提出申请，对证监会拒绝公司延长收购合格资产期限等决定和要求，展开司法审核。

然而，Best Oracle的努力同样无功而返，在上个月遭到高庭拒绝。【e南洋】

Type	Announcement
Subject	OTHERS
Description	CLIQ Energy Berhad ("CLIQ") - Statement by the Management and Promoters of CLIQ
We refer to our Annual Report dated 29 July 2016 (“AR”) issued pursuant to Paragraph 9.23 of Listing Requirements. It has been brought to our attention that the physical copy of the AR that was sent out to the shareholders contained an additional page entitled “Statement by the Management and Promoters of CLIQ Energy Berhad” on page 6 of the physical copy of the AR (please refer to the attachment). The Independent Directors of CLIQ wish to clarify that the abovementioned “Statement by the Management and Promoters of CLIQ Energy Berhad” was issued without the knowledge nor approved by the Board of Directors of CLIQ. This announcement is dated 2 August 2016.

http://www.bursamalaysia.com/market/listed-companies/company-announcements/5165613

Attachments CLIQ Energy Bhd - pg 6.pdf

Type	Announcement
Subject	OTHERS
Description	CLIQ Energy Berhad ("CLIQ") - Statement by the Management and Promoters of CLIQ
Further to our announcement dated 2 August 2016 in relation to “Statement by the Management and Promoters of CLIQ Energy Berhad”, the Board of Directors of CLIQ (represented by the directors who are not conflicted to decide on behalf of the Company) wishes to clarify that the Letter of Appeal for the extension of time (“EOT”) mentioned in the statement is not a new appeal, as the EOT has not been considered by the Securities Commission Malaysia (“SC”) as announced on 24 February 2016. Currently, there is no outstanding appeal to the SC. CLIQ is currently in the process of winding-up, which will facilitate the return the trust money to its shareholders. As announced previously, the hearing date for the Judicial Review Appeal filed by the shareholders of Best Oracle Sdn Bhd is fixed on 14 September 2016 and the hearing for the Petition to wind up CLIQ under Section 218(1)(h) of the Companies Act, 1965 is fixed on 20 September 2016. This announcement is dated 2 August 2016.

icy97

关注何时取回现金
CLIQ股东拒批董事费

2016年9月2日
（吉隆坡1日讯）CLIQ能源（CLIQ，5234，主板特殊收购股）股东今日在常年大会上，反对了3项议案中的2项。

CLIQ能源主席兼独立非执行主席拿督阿兹米在股东大会后对记者说，股东反对了截至今年3月的2016财年，高达35万9720令吉的董事费。

根据文告，该公司的投票结果显示，董事薪酬议案的反对票达3亿2910万4324票，或88.95%。

同时，股东也非常关注何时可以获得该公司的现金回退。

他指出：“股东关心何时可以获得现金回退，但这赖于公司能否获得高庭庭令，好让我们清盘。”

重委执行董事遇阻

另外，重新委任卡马鲁巴哈林为执行董事的议案也被取消了，因为当事人要求不被重选。

阿兹米补充，不过股东已批准了重新委任安永为公司审计师的第三项议案。

该议案共获2亿1229万6924赞成票，或52.75%。

今日召开的CLIQ能源股东大会共有三项议案，分别是2016财年董事薪酬、重新委任卡马鲁巴哈林为执行董事及重新委任安永为公司审计师。

早前媒体报道，大股东西瓦古玛，正拉拢其他股东，一致在来临的股东大会反对所有提出的议案。

他说：“如果股东想看到公司清盘，那他们必须在重新委任审计师投反对票，因为公司已经不需要他们了。”

由于无法在期限内购得合格资产（QA），CLIQ能源已在4月25日向大马高庭提出清盘申请，以解散公司。

但过后包括大股东Best Oracle私人有限公司在内的CLIQ能源管理层，又向高庭申请司法审核，要求法庭暂停清盘令。

截至司法审核结果出炉前，CLIQ能源不能清盘。【e南洋】


小股东发出质疑声·CLIQ不放弃购油气资产
2016-09-02 18:49
http://www.sinchew.com.my/node/1563549/

icy97

Date of change	01 Sep 2016
Name	ENCIK KAMARUL BAHARIN BIN ALBAKRI
Age	54
Gender	Male
Nationality	Malaysia
Designation	Executive Director
Directorate	Executive
Type of change	Others
Description	Had offered himself not to seek re-election at the Fifth Annual General Meeting
Qualifications	He graduated with a Bachelor of Commerce (Accounting) degree from the University of Birmingham, England in 1985. He is a Chartered Accountant and a member of the MIA as well as a Fellow Member of the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants, UK.
Working experience and occupation	He began his career as an auditor with Arthur Anderson & Co in 1988 where he was involved in the audit of companies in wide-ranging industries, including PETRONAS Carigali, as well as business advisory. In 1993, after 5 years as an auditor, he joined the Corporate Finance department of the then Arab-Malaysian Merchant Bank Berhad (now known as AmInvestment Bank Berhad) where he was involved in corporate finance and privatisation advisory until 1994.Kamarul was the CEO of various companies for 15 years. Kamarul was the CEO of TH Technologies Sdn Bhd ("THT"), a subsidiary of Lembaga Tabung Haji (which has now merged with TH Properties), from December 1997 to December 2009. He joined THT in 1994 as a senior finance manager and was subsequently promoted to various positions before being appointed as the CEO of THT in December 1997. During his tenure as CEO, THT's capitalisation increased significantly from RM500,000 in 1994 to RM20 million in 2009. He was involved in design and build contracts for several projects undertaken by THT including the construction of Sultan Abdul Halim Hospital in Sungai Petani and Pusrawi Hospital at Jalan Tun Razak in Kuala Lumpur as well as road construction projects across Malaysia, namely from Kuala Selangor to Sabak Bernam, Melaka to Muar and Gua Musang to Chiku Aring. One of his key achievements as the CEO of THT was the successful completion of the design and build contract for a military camp in Gemas, Johor with a contract value of RM420 million for the Ministry of Defence, Malaysia. He also successfully formulated the idea for the commercial development of wakaf land to the Malaysian Government and negotiated for THT to be appointed as the design and build main contractor for Menara Bank Islam in Jalan Perak, Kuala Lumpur with a contract value of RM151 million.Under his helm, THT also ventured into the provision of oil & gas offshore support vessels with investment in 2 deep water anchor handling tug services.
Family relationship with any director and/or major shareholder of the listed issuer	Nil
Any conflict of interests that he/she has with the listed issuer	Nil
Details of any interest in the securities of the listed issuer or its subsidiaries	In CLIQ Energy BerhadDirect - NilIndirect - 126,188,080 (20%)

Remarks :

He has indicated that he will remain as Chief Financial Officer of CLIQ Energy Berhad

icy97

Best Oracle撤销对CLIQ能源清盘的上诉
By Sangeetha Amarthalingam / theedgemarkets.com   | September 20, 2016 : 5:32 PM MYT

（吉隆坡20日讯）CLIQ能源（CLIQ Energy Bhd）大股东Best Oracle私人有限公司，已同意不再继续针对高庭驳回其制止CLIQ能源执行清盘程序申请而提出的上诉行动。

CLIQ今日向大马交易所报备说：“听取双方证词后，副注册官谕令上诉终止，双方均不须向对方赔偿讼费。”

另外，在聆听CLIQ和Best Oracle代表律师的论点后，高庭择定9月26日对CLIQ清盘诉求作出裁决。

Best Oracle在4月提出司法审核，以阻止这家特别用途收购公司（SPAC）被清算。该公司将证券监督委员会（SC）和CLIQ列为被告。

在7月19日，高庭驳回Best Oracle暂缓CLIQ清盘呈请的申请。

Best Oracle持有CLIQ的20%股权，且股东是CLIQ管理层的5名成员。

（编译：陈慧珊）

Type	Announcement
Subject	WINDING UP / RECEIVER & MANAGER / RESTRAINING ORDER / SPECIAL ADMINISTRATOR
Description	Update of Liquidation
Further to the various announcements made by the Company prior to this, the Board of Directors of CLIQ (represented by the directors who are not conflicted to decide on behalf of the Company) wishes to inform that Best Oracle Sdn Bhd (“BOSB”) has agreed to discontinue its’ appeal for the striking out application by the Company to liquidate itself pursuant to Section 218(1)(h) of the Companies Act, 1965 by filing the Notice of Discontinuance and the Company has agreed to this discontinuance.  After hearing both parties, the Learned Deputy Registrar ordered the Appeal be discontinued with no order as to cost. Separately, the High Court today, has fixed the decision for the Petition to wind up CLIQ under Section 218(1)(h) of the Companies Act, 1965 on 26 September 2016, after hearing the arguments from the counsels for CLIQ and the counsels for BOSB. This announcement is dated 20 September 2016.