MH 17 驾驶舱 弹孔口径不符
排除地对空导弹攻击
把乌克兰飞行员摆进谋杀MH17 框架里面
这是一个德国飞行员兼航空技术专家 Peter Haisenko
刚刚发布的 MH17灾难（我的重点）的题目：
“马来西亚 MH017的不幸是已知的等皆飞行
录音机是在英格兰和正在接受评估。有什么可以来这？
比你要接受....如果你的形象可能更
驾驶舱片段，这张照片肯定是令人震惊的。
入口和出口孔从驾驶舱的区域子弹。这不是炒作，而是事实清楚分析：驾驶舱
显示的弹孔清晰的证据。你可以看到入口孔和
一些出口点。弹孔的边缘向内弯曲，
合成小得多，呈圆形。使用30mm口径。退出
孔较差的形成和边缘是向外撕裂。
而且它是可见没有更多的出口孔都撕了双
铝皮和向外弯曲它们。也就是说，碎片从
驾驶舱内通过室外侧吹。开
铆钉已经使向外弯曲....只有一个结论可以做，而且也thatthis是：
飞机被导弹什么不能打。对飞机的损害是
只在驾驶舱区域....
装甲穿甲弹。俄罗斯已公布的雷达数据做了
乌克兰苏MH25是接近017，这相当于与西班牙航空
交通管制做了两个乌克兰战斗机是直接
与MH017联系检查苏25的武器：它装
出了30mm机炮GSH-302型/ AO-17A，250轮
在皮带上分裂爆炸子弹 - 弹片弹。驾驶舱
MH017从两侧打，因为有入口和出口孔
同方......“
非常引人注目的东西，不是吗？
现在读这（即德国）由防务专家贝恩德·毕得曼，谁提供的声音同样原因的文章为什么
根本不可能被击落从地空导弹：
“在拍摄马来西亚下来
在乌克兰东部“波音公司于7月17日已经不能打了
表面对防空导弹“。
这是退役上校贝恩德·比德尔曼以评估
文章的报纸在柏林出版的“新德国”
（周四版）。有碎片从地对空导弹击中
在飞机上，它会立刻起火，北越期简论
防空导弹专家。他的理由是因为
“巨大的摩擦热也稀里哗啦产生的渗透
机身。一个单一的碎片包含相同的动能
40吨货车撞击缓冲区以每小时60公里。“在
马来西亚波音公司的情况下，分散了火灾后爆发
与地面的冲击，由于从飞机热碎片有
来与可燃物质接触。
比德尔曼熟悉苏联和俄罗斯的防空技术，
他领导的单位值班人员制度在东德和任教于
在军校中的防空导弹部队的领域'。
文章开始在网路出现的效果也安格拉·默克尔是由（和越来越厌倦）的不断宣传美国正在发射赞成其能源议程....干扰，所以我们必须把可能在视图合成物品在光的关于建立一个替代阵营，以做美国的她据称新的议程。 （在此这里更多在不久的将来）。
但旋与否，论文分析是有意义的。
国美系现在已开始从“俄罗斯暴行”的地位，以“悲惨的意外”。
上述意见并建议既不是真实的：他们 " 强烈建议“ 乌克兰空军打 下 MH17。
Surface to air missile attack ruled out
as calibre of cockpit bullet holes puts
Ukraine pilots in the frame for MH17 murdersThis is what a German pilot-cum-air technology expert Peter Haisenko
has just published on the subject of the MH17 disaster (my emphases): ‘The misfortune of the Malaysian MH 017 is known to all. The flight
recorder is in England and is being evaluated. What can come of this?
May be more than you want to accept….if you look at the image of
Cockpit-Fragments, this picture is certainly shocking.
Entry And Exit holes from bullets in the area of the Cockpit.
This is not speculation, but analysis of clear facts:
the cockpit shows clear evidence of bullet holes.
You can see the entry holes and
some exit points. The edges of the bullet holes are bent inwards,
these are much smaller and round in shape. A 30mm calibre. The exit
holes are less well formed and the edges are torn outwards.
Furthermore it is visible that the exit holes have torn the double
aluminium skin and bent them outwards. That is to say, splinters from
inside the cockpit blew through the outside of the cabin. The open
rivets have also been bent outwards….There is only one conclusion one can make, and that is that this: the
aircraft was not hit by a missile. The damage to the aircraft is
exclusively in the cockpit area…. Armour-Piercing Ammunition. Russia has published radar data that a
Ukranian SU 25 was close to MH 017. this corresponds with Spanish air
traffic control that two Ukranian fighter aircraft were in direct
contact with MH 017. Examine the weaponry of the SU 25: it is fitted
out with a 30mm cannon Type GSch-302 /AO-17A, with 250 rounds of
splintering exploding bullets on a belt – shrapnel rounds. The cockpit
of MH 017 was hit from TWO sides, as there are entry and exit holes on
the same side….’
Very compelling stuff, is it not? Now read this (also German) article by defence expert Bernd Biederman,
who offers equally sound reasons why the
shooting down could NOT have been from a surface to air missile: ‘ the shooting down of the Malaysian
Boeing on July 17 in the Eastern Ukraine “could not have been hit by a
surface to air defense missile” . This is the assessment of retired Colonel Bernd Biedermann in an
article for the daily newspaper published in Berlin “new Germany”
(Thursday edition). Had splinters from a surface to air missile hit
the plane, it would have immediately caught fire, argues the NVA
anti-aircraft missile specialist. His reasoning is because of the
“enormous frictional heat that the splinters generate on penetrating
the fuselage. A single splinter contains the same kinetic energy as a
40-ton freight car hitting the buffers at 60 kilometers per hour.”
In the case of the Malaysian Boeing, scattered fires had broken out after
the impact with the ground, because hot debris from the aircraft had
come in contact with combustible materials. Biedermann is familiar with Soviet and Russian air defense technology,
he led units in the duty officer system in East Germany and taught at
the Military Academy in the field of anti-aircraft missile troops.’ Articles are beginning to appear across the Web to the effect that Angela Merkel is
disturbed by (and growing tired of) the incessant US propaganda being
emitted in favour of its energy agenda….and so we must perhaps in turn view these articles
in the light of her alleged new agenda concerning the creation of an alternative bloc to that
of America. (More on this here in the near future). But spin or not, these analyses make sense.
The US State Dept has now shifted its position from
‘Russian atrocity’ to ‘tragic accident’.
The above opinions suggest that neither are true:
they suggest strongly that the Ukrainian air force took out MH17.
| 
本周最热论坛帖子
发表于 30-7-2014 01:04 AM
变色卡
千斤顶
楼主
.gif)
。
2562 
77
