ACCA毕业生/学生请报到 6

龟龟龟

各位读ACCA 或读过ACCA 的朋友，欢迎大家来交流。

q

hmmm,留下脚印

MaryAnn

留个脚印先

ipohzai

踩踩踩，踏踏踏，先留个脚印~~~

star_sun

我也来一下

美丽草原我的家

草原报到~

xiaoyu0910

龟龟龟同学...我已经send给你了...希望你收到了
谢谢你

Mrfreedom

进来留下脚印~
还有一个月成绩就要出了...祝大家好运

whitehairbin

The ACCA Exam Review Board Meeting minutes for June 2009:


Paper P1 was found to be a fair paper with a good balance across the syllabus, with emphasis on governance and ethics.  Some  concerns were voiced around the policy on publication of articles production and whether the contents of such articles were always examined and when were tested.  It was explained that students are advised to look at a suite of articles rather than the most recently produced article. They should also note that articles written by other than the examiner are also relevant.  Question 4c) – It was pointed out that this was quite an unexpected question.  Although risk is a large area of the P1 syllabus, entrepreneurial risks are not specifically mentioned in the study guide so it was argued to be a concept tested which students are not aware of. However, it was worth only four marks, so not a major issue and students are answering well.



Paper P2 was found to be a difficult but fair paper. There seemed to more emphasis on ethical discussion as in previous papers.  Question 1 was found to be rather complex.  Question 4 contained numerical content which was found to be unusual and hence there was little scope for discursive answers.  ACCA stated that the examiner at the February conference and within the examiners presentation on ACCA website indicated that the style of question 4 would change to include some numerical aspects to encourage candidates to choose this question.  IFRIC 4 – Candidates seemed to have missed this.  However, the examiner stated that IFRICs were a syllabus area that he would examine and expected candidates to have knowledge of them.  



Paper P3 was fair with some long scenarios, especially question 1 and students found the paper very time pressured.  There were concerns around qestion 1b) being difficult to justify a single strategic solution or option for this question. However, it was reported that the examiner had instructed markers to exercise flexibility to award marks when other options had been justified and where the arguments used were reasonable and supported by evidence from the case.  Students felt that the examiner did not specify which models to use. However, the examiner has stated at the teachers’ conference that specification of models will be made in some requirements where there is only one which he wants to assess.


Paper P4 was a difficult and technically poor paper allowing students little chance to prove their P4 knowledge.  Questions did not relate to core P4 material. The poor syllabus coverage makes it difficult for students to prepare for this paper.  Questions 1 and 5 were more of F9 content, with a twist, rather than core P4 topics.  Question 3 was considered strange and Question 4 was common sense. Only Q2 would be considered reasonable.


Paper P5 was a fair but demanding paper found to be highly numerical but less strategic.  There was concern that some requirements are considered outside the syllabus such as Question 2 part b) and d). Part d) was more of F5 content.  Question 3 on Expectancy theory and Question 5 on Six sigma would more likely to be found in a P3 paper rather than P5. However, it is inevitable there will be a P3 overlap in this paper and this is highlighted in study guide.



The P6 paper was a fair but challenging paper with vigorous coverage of the syllabus.  An improvement from the previous paper.  Students struggled with question 5.  Corporation tax had less emphasis was absent than personal tax.  As was VAT on land & buildings and capital goods scheme did not feature, despite the examiner emphasising this area at the teachers’ conference.  Most students felt the requirements were clear and there was adequate syllabus coverage, although a lot felt it was too time pressured, and some struggled with the level of difficulty.


Members found paper P7 to be a well-balanced paper with good syllabus coverage.  The paper continues to follow a familiar pattern. Students should be able to cope with the paper if they are adequately prepared. The examiner has provided adequate notice of complex FR issues.  Question 3 was found to be too demanding and required a pool of knowledge, and there was a narrow focus on an ISRE.  Students found this paper to be fair and balanced but there were negative comments in relation to time.


P4 - killing paper( last sitting)

pinkdolphin

先来报到！

jusname

不好意识。
有没有人知道obu的RAP这么做啊？
什么事SLS STATEMENT?
有没有人之前做了OBU可以借我你的RAP当作参考吗？？
要到哪DOWNLOAD OBU'S RAP GUIDELINE?怎么我在ACCA WEBSITE找不到？？

flowerforever

我想问，现ACCA到21岁，不用读LCCI OR CAT就可以读了，你们觉得OK吗？会不会基础不好？？
还有，如果我只是想拿DEGREE，我只需要PASS 9 个PAPAER？那，他的DEGREE和现在市面上的DEGREE一样？

郭富城的仇人

原帖由 flowerforever 于 13-7-2009 04:35 PM 发表
我想问，现ACCA到21岁，不用读LCCI OR CAT就可以读了，你们觉得OK吗？会不会基础不好？？
还有，如果我只是想拿DEGREE，我只需要PASS 9 个PAPAER？那，他的DEGREE和现在市面上的DEGREE一样？

没错，如果你已满21岁，你就可以用MSER直接读ACCA，无需先读CAT或LCCI。不过，你要在4个sitting pass了F2和F3才可以考其他paper。

关于pass了9张paper拿Degree的问题，其实正确的说法是pass了F1 - F9，再写一份论文，pass了的话, 就可以拿到Degree。这张Degree其实是OBU Degree in Applied Accounting，其价值当然比不上市面上的Degree in Accounting。

另外，其实读ACCA最主要目的是要得到其专业资格，而OBU只是extra，是可有可无的。即使你同时间拿到ACCA和OBU，但也不等于你的前途会比只有ACCA的考生专业资格好很多。

奉劝你如果真是要读ACCA的话，就要好好pass完14张paper，如果有多余时间才考虑去做OBU。另外，不要浪费RM4500给骗钱学院Sunway来做OBU，因为根本不值得。要做OBU就用Zero Cost Method！

[ 本帖最后由 郭富城的仇人 于 13-7-2009 05:06 PM 编辑 ]

柠檬树

原帖由 xiaoyu0910 于 12-7-2009 10:46 PM 发表
龟龟龟同学...我已经send给你了...希望你收到了
谢谢你

龟龟龟同学，你可以给我xiaoyu0910的问题和答案吗？我也想了解conso.
谢谢你

xiaoyu0910

原帖由 柠檬树 于 13-7-2009 08:59 PM 发表


龟龟龟同学，你可以给我xiaoyu0910的问题和答案吗？我也想了解conso.
谢谢你

哇...你也想了解哦...你就给我你的email add吧. 我直接send question给你...不过暂时还做不出一个完整的答案
因为龟龟龟同学他忙于考试...

姨姨1111

新帖。。留腳印。同學們加油

flowerforever

大大们！！我想问下。。在WAWASAN OPEN UNIVERSITY拿ACCOUNTING，了想拿ACCA OR CIMA，可以EXEMPTION几个PAPER？？？还有，在OPEN UNIVERSITY拿ACCOUNTING，可以EXEMPTION 几个PAPER？

郭富城的仇人

原帖由 flowerforever 于 14-7-2009 02:40 PM 发表
大大们！！我想问下。。在WAWASAN OPEN UNIVERSITY拿ACCOUNTING，了想拿ACCA OR CIMA，可以EXEMPTION几个PAPER？？？还有，在OPEN UNIVERSITY拿ACCOUNTING，可以EXEMPTION 几个PAPER？

我想暂时没人可以答到你这个问题，因为不同Uni的Degree可以得到不同的exemption。

不过，根据ACCA的exemption rules，任何Degree或Prof Qualification最多只可以拿到F1-F9的exemption，而Prof Level是一定要考！

你或者到ACCA Malaysia Office问有关exemption的详情。

flowerforever

我打去问了。。。答两次，第一次问了WAWASAN，那女的说可以四张。。。在第二天问，一个男的。。他说目前为止，OPEN U 没有。。 所以我才来这里问

美丽草原我的家

原帖由 flowerforever 于 14-7-2009 03:39 PM 发表
我打去问了。。。答两次，第一次问了WAWASAN，那女的说可以四张。。。在第二天问，一个男的。。他说目前为止，OPEN U 没有。。 所以我才来这里问

到这里看看
http://www.accaglobal.com/join/exemptions/