Malay
颜色选择
阳光橙
深夜黑
天空蓝
葡萄紫
薄荷绿
深海蓝
首页
论坛
佳礼报道
新闻
搜索
5900
查看
119
回复

英足总官方宣布重罚苏亚雷斯停赛10场 + 利物浦队友力挺:与断腿相比我宁愿被咬一口

[复制链接]

楼主: Mysterio619       显示全部楼层   阅读模式

发表于 27-4-2013 05:00 PM | 显示全部楼层
Py1984 发表于 27-4-2013 08:50 AM
赛季缩影4

so1 你想表达的是以苏牙一人之力就综合了全部缩影?
你需要这样针对他吗?!
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 27-4-2013 05:03 PM | 显示全部楼层
PhantomD 发表于 27-4-2013 02:37 PM
英超5大超长停赛苏牙两度遭重罚康托纳飞腿排第一
利物浦前锋苏亚雷斯被处以10场停赛。这样的重罚,在英超 ...

这就是所谓的 识少少扮代表!
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 27-4-2013 05:12 PM | 显示全部楼层
愤怒小屁屁 发表于 27-4-2013 05:00 PM
so1 你想表达的是以苏牙一人之力就综合了全部缩影?
你需要这样针对他吗?!

他想要表达的是liverpool的没落是因为曼联影响了FA
可是chelsea, man city, arsenal不会没落?奇怪
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 27-4-2013 06:03 PM | 显示全部楼层
KingArthur 发表于 25-4-2013 08:03 PM
说句公道话啦,被罚是应该的,但没想到会那么多场,我觉得3-5场比较合理啦

以前再netherland都好像6-7场了, 现在再来。
有racist。 是我肯定给他10场 。。。


回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 27-4-2013 08:00 PM | 显示全部楼层
hackintosh 发表于 27-4-2013 06:03 PM
以前再netherland都好像6-7场了, 现在再来。
有racist。 是我肯定给他10场 。。。

有些人说是为了保RVP夺金靴,保不保都无所谓啦,冠军都到手了
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 27-4-2013 08:52 PM | 显示全部楼层
其实你们都不体谅利迷此刻的心情

回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 27-4-2013 08:56 PM | 显示全部楼层
PhantomD 发表于 27-4-2013 02:37 PM
英超5大超长停赛苏牙两度遭重罚康托纳飞腿排第一
利物浦前锋苏亚雷斯被处以10场停赛。这样的重罚,在英超 ...

那些逃过重罚的list比起这些又算得了什么。。。
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 27-4-2013 09:01 PM | 显示全部楼层
Minson 发表于 27-4-2013 08:56 PM
那些逃过重罚的list比起这些又算得了什么。。。

谁??????
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 27-4-2013 09:07 PM | 显示全部楼层
热闹下~
希望这贴BZ不要封帖啊~这个可以拿来当道德风向标~引以为戒,以后有那些球员犯了错~可以让各路球迷来交流批判对与错~
只是希望到时各路球迷可以踊跃像这帖这样公正公平地交流批判
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 27-4-2013 09:28 PM | 显示全部楼层
PhantomD 发表于 27-4-2013 09:01 PM
谁??????

我不怪你。。。
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 27-4-2013 10:05 PM | 显示全部楼层
大家要稳定,不要乱噢
以免伤了和气,先来一首最近很流行的歌曲
Love is in the air!


话说回来,我觉得阿苏七号,下一届应该会走人,可能去西甲吧
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 27-4-2013 10:21 PM | 显示全部楼层
KingArthur 发表于 27-4-2013 10:05 PM
大家要稳定,不要乱噢
以免伤了和气,先来一首最近很流行的歌曲
Love is in the air!
...

原来你支持卖花的~


回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 27-4-2013 11:01 PM | 显示全部楼层
你们不累的meh
要找一些词汇来配合他们
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 29-4-2013 12:32 AM | 显示全部楼层
PhantomD 发表于 27-4-2013 09:01 PM
谁??????

李三腳的傳人嗎...
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 29-4-2013 01:02 AM | 显示全部楼层
Py1984 发表于 27-4-2013 08:29 AM
既然版主允许离题,借这个楼层用一用

http://ifublog.com/cincai

评分

参与人数 1人气 +1 收起 理由
Py1984 + 1 sh onn

查看全部评分

回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 29-4-2013 01:08 AM | 显示全部楼层
看到这里差队球迷的反应...

回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 29-4-2013 01:23 AM | 显示全部楼层
Kenny Dalglish on Luis Suarez ban: Why the FA panel bit off more than they could chew

The football governing body's so-called 'independent regulatory commission' is anything but. What Luis Suarez did when he bit Branislav Ivanovic was unacceptable. No one is disputing that.

As far as I am aware, no one at Liverpool Football Club is running away from their responsibilities over that. The club has said that he was wrong. Luis, himself, has admitted that he was wrong, and they were both right and wise to accept the punishment yesterday.

The issue is clearly in the length of the player’s ban and the fact that the FA’s disciplinary system is a horrible mess.

Let’s start with the fact that the FA said before they had appointed the so-called ‘independent’ regulatory commission that Suarez deserved more than the normal three-game ban.

Well, by saying that, they prejudiced the findings of the commission before it has even begun.

They appointed the people to sit on it and they have told them they are there to give him more than three games.

So those three people know they have to give the player more than three games just to justify their existence.

How ‘independent’ does that make the three-man commission?

I wish the FA would just stop playing with words. Because this panel wasn’t truly independent and to say it was is blatantly misleading.

The FA chooses who sits on it to begin with. Does that make it ‘independent’?

And who sits on it? An ex-player, an FA council member and a lawyer already known to the FA.

So there’s an FA council member on an ‘independent’ FA commission. That’s convenient.

And there’s an ex-player, who would probably like to do more work for the FA. That’s convenient, too.

Are they paid, by the way? Are they paid by the FA? Do they do it for free? I don’t know the answer to those questions but

I’d like to know.

The point is that the structure of an FA disciplinary procedure like this is inherently unfair.

If you commit a crime in this country, you get the right for your case to be heard by a jury that has no affiliation or responsibility to the people prosecuting you.

That’s not how the FA works it. In fact, their disciplinary system has now become so confused and riddled with anomalies that it is farcical.

They hide behind excuses about the referee saw it or didn’t see it, punished it or didn’t punish it.

So Jermain Defoe bites Javier Mascherano on the arm and gets a yellow card. Nothing more.

Suarez bites Ivanovic and gets 10 games. Why? Because the referee didn’t see it.

He still spoke to him about something and looked like he was warning him but he didn’t see it.

For the benefit of football in this country, there has got to be greater clarification of the rules and more balance in the way offenders are judged.

The most important thing is not the length of the sentence but how they reach it and that information needs to be made public at the time the punishment is announced. That would have alleviated much of the unnecessary discussion about the ban handed down to Suarez.

The FA has been in need of widespread reform for a long time. The need is getting more and more pressing.


These regulatory commissions have to be independent in more than just name.



回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 29-4-2013 01:23 AM | 显示全部楼层


评分

参与人数 1人气 +1 收起 理由
Py1984 + 1 on 9 多一个

查看全部评分

回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 29-4-2013 08:16 AM | 显示全部楼层
垃圾球队盛产垃圾"球迷",果然对等



what a pity, manure fans,“ why middle finger for us?”



本帖最后由 Py1984 于 29-4-2013 08:45 AM 编辑

回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 29-4-2013 09:12 AM | 显示全部楼层
大快凉心啊
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册 | 登入

本版积分规则

 WeChat
 CARI App
Get it FREE Google play
 Instagram
cari_malaysia
FOLLOW
- 版权所有 © 1996-2019 Cari Internet Sdn Bhd 佳礼网络有限公司 (483575-W) -
Private Cloud provided by IPSERVERONE
0.175425s Gzip On
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表